MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066226233 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2011.6026440

A face portion based recognition system using multidimensional PCA

2011· article· en· W2066226233 on OpenAlexaff
A. A. Mohammed, Rashid Minhas, Q. M. Jonathan Wu, M.A. Sid-Ahmed

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceFacial recognition systemPrincipal component analysisComputer scienceDimensionality reductionCurveletFace (sociological concept)Classifier (UML)Feature extractionCurse of dimensionalityFeature (linguistics)Extreme learning machineContextual image classificationImage (mathematics)Computer visionArtificial neural networkWavelet transformWavelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a new human face recognition algorithm based on localized face portion of an image is proposed. Extracted pure facial image is decomposed using curvelet transform and its selected subband is utilized for classification. Subband exhibiting a maximum standard deviation is dimensionally reduced using an improved dimensionality reduction technique, i.e., bidirectional two-dimensional principal component analysis to generate distinctive feature sets. These feature sets are used for training and testing an extreme learning machine classifier. Notable contributions of the proposed work include significant improvements in classification rate, speed and negligible dependence on the number of prototypes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning and ELMFrench-language works237,207