Interparticle Liquid Film Formation during Spark Plasma Sintering of Inconel 718 Superalloy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of powder metallurgy for near net shape sintering of superalloy could lead to major savings in machining time and material. The main challenge in sintering Inconel 718 is to avoid the formation of a prior particle boundary (PPB) network that is deleterious to the mechanical properties. Using the Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) technique, it is believed that Inconel 718 powders could be sintered without forming a PPB network due to the fast heating rate achieved and the reported cleaning effect of particle surfaces by the interparticle arc discharges. In this study, Inconel 718 was consolidated to near-full density at 1200°C under 50 MPa of pressure with heating rates ranging from 20°C/min to 800°C/min. The densification behavior of the powder was studied through the analysis of the densification curves and observation of the microstructure evolution from interrupted tests. The fast densification of Inconel 718 in SPS was linked to the formation of a supersolidus liquid phase due to the nature of the heating in this technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".