MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066253228 · doi:10.1115/detc2010-28103

Neural Network Bushing Model Development Using Simulation

2010· article· en· W2066253228 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Data Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBushingArtificial neural networkComputer scienceData modelingTraining setArtificial intelligenceData acquisitionNetwork modelSet (abstract data type)SimulationEngineeringMechanical engineeringDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neural networks are computationally efficient mathematical models that can be used to model quantitative and qualitative data. A neural network can be created through training with known input and output load-deflection data such that it learns to generalize the material characteristics without over-predicting the training data and losing its ability to anticipate behavior outside the training set. The challenge in creating a neural network model of a rubber bushing in a virtual model of a prototype assembly, for instance, is the lack of a physical prototype assembly. This paper describes a method by which data can be measured from a virtual prototype and used to define an appropriate data acquisition for the physical bushing. Training data can then be acquired using these guidelines and used for neural network model development. Subsequently, the enhanced model can then be used in the virtual simulation environment to increase the accuracy of the simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207