Heterogeneity of action potential durations in isolated mouse left and right atria recorded using voltage-sensitive dye mapping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An imaging system for di-4-ANEPPS (4-[beta-[2-(di-n-butylamino)-6-naphthylvinyl]pyridinium]) voltage-sensitive dye recordings has been adapted for recording from an in vitro mouse heart preparation that consists of both atria in isolation. This approach has been used to study inter- and intra-atrial activation and conduction and to monitor action potential durations (APDs) in the left and right atrium. The findings from this study confirm some of our previous findings in isolated mouse atrial myocytes and demonstrate that many electrophysiological properties of mouse atria closely resemble those of larger mammals. Specifically, we made the following observations: 1) Activation in mouse atria originates in the sinoatrial node and spreads into the right atrium and, after a delay, into the left atrium. 2) APD in the left atrium is shorter than in the right atrium. 3) Sites in the posterior walls have longer APDs than sites in the atrial appendages. 4) Superfusion of this preparation with 4-aminopyridine and tetraethylammonium resulted in increases in APD, consistent with their inhibitory effects on the K+ currents known to be expressed in mouse atria. 5) The muscarinic agonist carbachol shortened APD in all areas of the preparation, except the left atrial appendage, in which carbachol had no statistically significant effect on APD. These results validate a new approach for monitoring activation, conduction, and repolarization in mouse atria and demonstrate that the physiological and pharmacological properties of mouse atria are sufficiently similar to those of larger animals to warrant further studies using this preparation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".