MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Antimicrobial Macroporous Gel-Glasses: Dissolution and Cytotoxicity

2003· article· en· W2066266103 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsKensington Health
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council
KeywordsDissolutionAntimicrobialCytotoxicityMaterials scienceChemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryOrganic chemistryEngineeringBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The incidence of biomaterial-centred infections underlies the need to improve the properties of existing biomaterials. Combining the bioactive properties of calcia-silicate gel-glasses with that of the silver would prevent infections without the use of antibiotic drugs. Inclusion of silver into bioactive gel-glass foam scaffolds is explored using in vitro characterization techniques. The amount of silver released from Ag-doped S70C30 foams is well above the minimum bactericidal concentration (0.1 ppm) but below the cytotoxic concentration (1.6 ppm) for human cells. Primary human osteoblasts proliferate on the silver-doped gel-glasses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it