MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066322307 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2003.817749

Two-layer network equivalent for electromagnetic transients

2003· article· en· W2066322307 on OpenAlexaff
Mansour H. Abdel-Rahman, A. Semlyen, Mohammad Reza Iravani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdmittanceEquivalent circuitElectric power transmissionAdmittance parametersElectric power systemTransmission lineFrequency responseControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringPower (physics)Topology (electrical circuits)EngineeringComputer sciencePhysicsElectrical impedanceElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The frequency spectrum of an external system used in the simulation of electromagnetic transients shows many peaks due to resonance effects of the leading transmission lines. Therefore, the two-level equivalent we developed contains simplified lines for the leading part of the system and lumped elements represented by rational functions as a correction for the rest of the external system. This leads to a computationally more efficient model, over a wide frequency range, than the existing equivalents with only lumped parameter components. The paper describes how the parameters of the new equivalent are optimized for most accurate fitting of the input admittance while assuring its positive realness and accuracy at DC and power frequency. Generators in the external system are represented in the equivalent as Norton current sources at the connecting terminals. The equivalents can be single or multiport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207