MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066322307 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2003.817749

Two-layer network equivalent for electromagnetic transients

2003· article· en· W2066322307 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdmittanceEquivalent circuitElectric power transmissionAdmittance parametersElectric power systemTransmission lineFrequency responseControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringPower (physics)Topology (electrical circuits)EngineeringComputer sciencePhysicsElectrical impedanceElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The frequency spectrum of an external system used in the simulation of electromagnetic transients shows many peaks due to resonance effects of the leading transmission lines. Therefore, the two-level equivalent we developed contains simplified lines for the leading part of the system and lumped elements represented by rational functions as a correction for the rest of the external system. This leads to a computationally more efficient model, over a wide frequency range, than the existing equivalents with only lumped parameter components. The paper describes how the parameters of the new equivalent are optimized for most accurate fitting of the input admittance while assuring its positive realness and accuracy at DC and power frequency. Generators in the external system are represented in the equivalent as Norton current sources at the connecting terminals. The equivalents can be single or multiport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it