MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066348722 · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.046303

Generalized hydrodynamic theory of shock waves in rigid diatomic gases

2001· article· en· W2066348722 on OpenAlexafffund
Mazen Al‐Ghoul, Byung Chan Eu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAmerican University of Beirut
KeywordsMach numberDiatomic moleculePhysicsShock waveClassical mechanicsShock (circulatory)Shock tubeField (mathematics)Moving shockGravitational singularityMechanicsMach waveQuantum mechanicsMathematicsMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generalized hydrodynamic theory of shock waves is phenomenologically developed for rigid diatomic molecules. The generalized hydrodynamic equations developed are thermodynamically consistent, obeying the laws of thermodynamics. They reduce to the Navier-Stokes-Fourier theory of the classical hydrodynamics in the limit of low Mach number. The theory is applied to study the one-dimensional shock wave structure of nitrogen gas, which is treated as a rigid molecule. An excellent agreement with experiment is obtained for the inverse shock widths up to Mach number 10 reported in the literature. The theory is applicable to arbitrary dimension. On the basis of direction field singularities of the velocity and temperature evolution equations of the theory, it is possible to predict that the shock solutions exist for all Mach numbers in the case of one-dimensional shock waves studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topicsSame topicGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryFrench-language works237,207