NEW INDUSTRIAL SPACES: EVALUATING SOUTH AFRICA'S SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES (SDI) PROGRAMME
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The Spatial Development Initiatives (SDI) programme was launched in South Africa in 1995 and subsequently extended throughout Southern Africa by a series of regional SDIs. This article seeks to provide an introduction to the changing policy debates surrounding SDIs from the period of their birth to their current maturation and possible onset of decline. Three major sections are presented. First, an examination is undertaken of the origins, fundamental strategies and principles of the SDI programme. Against this background, the focus in the second section turns to an assessment of the progress and contemporary directions being taken by the SDI programme. Finally, the paper summarizes the findings of the research conducted by the New Industrial Spaces Project in relation both to the potential and actual impacts of SDI's on corridor communities and peoples, and to those marginal to the new space-economy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it