Kinetics Study on the Sol−Gel Reactions in Supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> by Using In situ ATR-FTIR Spectrometry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Direct sol−gel processing in supercritical CO 2 (scCO 2 ) has been of significant interest for synthesizing oxide nanomaterials, and the reactions of metal alkoxides with organic acids have been extensively used for preparing metal complex crystals; however, a kinetics analysis of these reactions has not been reported. In this research, in situ ATR-FTIR spectra were collected during the sol−gel synthesis of Si, Ti, and Zr oxides in scCO 2 . Because of overlapping of the IR peaks, it was difficult to directly correlate the optical absorbance with the analyte concentrations. To solve this problem, we used a chemometrics method, simple-to-use interactive self-modeling mixture analysis (SIMPLISMA), to calculate the concentration profiles. The precursor conversions and the intermediate concentration profiles under different synthesis conditions were obtained. The different kinetics profiles of Ti and Zr complexes in the sol−gel reactions were related to the activity of the metal complexes, and the competition of the various condensation reactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it