MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066365661 · doi:10.1017/s0266466606060282

A DATA-DRIVEN NONPARAMETRIC SPECIFICATION TEST FOR DYNAMIC REGRESSION MODELS

2006· article· en· W2066365661 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconometric Theory · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsNonparametric statisticsParametric statisticsNonparametric regressionRegressionNull hypothesisChi-square testStatistical hypothesis testingStatisticsRegression analysisEconometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper introduces a new nonparametric specification test for dynamic regression models. The test combines chi-square statistics based on Fourier series regression. A data-driven choice of the regression order, which uses the square root of the number of Fourier coefficients, is proposed. The benefits of the new test are (1) the selection procedure produces explicit and chi-square critical values that give a finite-sample size close to the nominal size; (2) the test is adaptive rate-optimal and detects local alternatives converging to the null with a rate that can be made arbitrarily close to the parametric rate. Simulation experiments illustrate the practical relevance of the new test.The first author acknowledges financial support from the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Société et la Culture (FQRSC). The second author acknowledges financial support from LSTA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it