TLR5 is not required for flagellin-mediated exacerbation of DSS colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The two forms of human inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are both associated with loss of tolerance to gut microbial antigens. The dominant antigen recognized by antibody and T-cell responses in patients with CD is bacterial flagellin. Flagellin is also the only known ligand for Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5), a key protein in innate immunity. Although flagellin activates TLR5 to produce inflammatory responses in many cell types in the gut, there is conflicting evidence as to whether TLR5 is harmful or protective in CD and murine colitis models. A recent study found that administration of flagellin enemas to mice along with dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) made their colitis worse. METHODS: We sought to determine whether this exacerbation was due to TLR5 ligation, or to TLR5-independent adaptive immune responses to flagellin as an antigen, by using a transposon insertional mutant of the Escherichia coli H18 flagellin, 2H3, which lacks TLR5 stimulatory activity. RESULTS: We found that flagellin enemas produced only a mild exacerbation of DSS colitis, and that 2H3 was equivalent to or worse than wildtype flagellin. Moreover, we found that DSS colitis was more severe in TLR5(-/-) mice than wildtype C57BL/6 mice. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these results suggest that flagellin-mediated exacerbation of colitis is independent of TLR5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".