MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066396075 · doi:10.1021/la046797f

Parabolic Focal Conics in Self-Assembled Solid Films of Cellulose Nanocrystals

2005· article· en· W2066396075 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsMaterials scienceMicrostructureLiquid crystalPerpendicularOpticsConic sectionColloidCelluloseNanocrystalOptical microscopeAntiparallel (mathematics)EvaporationCrystallographyComposite materialNanotechnologyChemistryOptoelectronicsScanning electron microscopeGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suspensions of cellulose nanocrystals form colloidal chiral nematic phases. The liquid crystalline order in these suspensions can be captured in solid films by slow evaporation of the liquid. Studies of the microstructure of such chiral nematic solid films revealed parabolic focal conic (PFC) defects, a symmetric form of focal conic defects in which the line defects form a pair of perpendicular, antiparallel, and confocal parabolas. The cellulose films with PFC defects were characterized by polarized-light and atomic force microscopy. The film surface showed a regular array of large and small elevations resulting from the displacement of the structural layers. Film fracture lines showed a series of layered half-cones. The microstructure of the films was modeled by computer. The model revealed that many structural layers terminate at the film surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it