MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066412169 · doi:10.1115/ht2008-56190

Natural Convective Heat Transfer From an Inclined Narrow Isothermal Flat Plate

2008· article· en· W2066412169 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick H. Oosthuizen, Abdulrahim Kalendar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrandtl numberMechanicsHeat transferNatural convectionAdiabatic processDimensionless quantityIsothermal processRayleigh numberMaterials scienceBuoyancyNusselt numberPhysicsThermodynamicsReynolds numberTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural convective heat transfer rate from an isothermal flat plate inclined at moderate angles to the vertical has been numerically studied. When the plate is wide compared to its height the flow can be adequately modeled by assuming two-dimensional flow. However, when the width of the plate is relatively small compared to its height, the heat transfer rate can be considerably greater than that predicted by these two-dimensional flow results. The heat transfer from a narrow isothermal plate embedded in a plane adiabatic surface, the adiabatic surface being in the same plane as the heated plate and inclined at an angle to the vertical has been numerically considered. Results for both positive and negative inclination angles have been numerically determined here. Attention was restricted to results for a Prandtl number of 0.7; this being approximately the value existing in the application that originally motivated this study. It has been assumed that the fluid properties are constant except for the density change with temperature which gives rise to the buoyancy forces, this having been treated by using the Boussinesq approach. It has also been assumed that the flow is symmetrical about the vertical centre-plane of the plate. The solution has been obtained by numerically solving the full three-dimensional form of the governing equations, these equations being written in dimensionless form. The solution was obtained using a commercial finite element method based code, FIDAP. The solution has the Rayleigh number, the dimensionless plate width, the angle of inclination, and the Prandtl number as parameters. Results have been obtained for Rayleigh numbers between 103 and 107 for ratios of the plate width to the plate height of between 0.3 and 1.5 and for angles of inclination between +45° and −45°.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207