Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les « portraits composites » de Francis Galton (1822-1911) consistaient à surimposer, les uns sur les autres, plusieurs portraits pour dégager, selon lui, le « type » du visage criminel avant « que les traits du visage soient brutalisés par le crime ». Que serait donc un visage criminel auquel il ne manque plus que le crime ? Position d’autant plus étonnante que Galton finit par admettre que l’infamie du visage réside dans chacun des visages photographiés et que l’humanité n’appartient qu’au « type » qui, en l’occurrence, n’existe que par la photographie et dans la photographie. Il s’agit dans cet article de reprendre, à travers une lecture de certains des textes que Galton a consacrés à la photographie, une théorie spécifique de l’image qui repose essentiellement sur un discours moral et politique touchant à l’hérédité des familles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".