MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066448700 · doi:10.1089/02724570050031202

A Panel of CAb Antibodies Recognize Endogenous and Ectopically Expressed ING1 Protein

2000· article· en· W2066448700 on OpenAlexaff
Donna Boland, Vanessa Olineck, Paul Bonnefin, Diego Vieyra, Edward J. Parr, Karl Riabowol

Bibliographic record

VenueHybridoma · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgarySAIT Polytechnic
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMonoclonal antibodyWestern blotMolecular biologyAntibodyImmunofluorescenceEndogenyFibroblastBiologyBlotCell cultureGene isoformImmunologyGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against human and rodent ING1 protein have been generated using an IL6-secreting mouse myeloma line. These antibodies are all effective in recognizing ING1 protein in ELISAs, Western blot assays, and by indirect immunofluorescence. Combining different CAb monoclonal antibodies in a Western blot assay also allows detection of the very low levels of endogenous ING1 found in fibroblast cells in culture and the identification of at least two isoforms of ING1 in normal human diploid fibroblasts and established brain cancer cell lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHybridomaSame topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysFrench-language works237,207