Extraction and Purification of Anti-Helicobacter pylori IgY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to establish an efficient procedure to produce anti-H. pylori urease IgY from the eggs of the laying hens. Four White Leghorn hens (52 weeks old) were immunized intramuscularly with the purified urease of H. pylori with aluminum hydroxide gel adjuvant. To increase the specificity and antibody titer, three boosters were given at 2-week intervals following the first injection. After the final immunization, the eggs were collected daily and stored at 4°C. The yield of yolk proteins were 47.52%, 41.07% and 51.35% for the methods of dextran sulphate, isopropanol and water-soluble fraction (WSF), respectively. Further, IgY was purified successively by ammonia sulfate, affinity chromatography and ion exchange chromatography for each crude protein. Ammonia sulfate salting produced the IgY with a purity of 37-53% and the titer of 22.6-29.5 unit/mg. The purity, relative purification folds and titer characteristics of the purified IgY were 85-90%, 19.63-34.61 and 223.8-273.4 unit/mg protein for affinity chromatography, and 89-92%, 25.33-47.14 and 288.8-372.4 unit/mg protein for ion exchange chromatography, respectively. This anti-Helicobacter pylori IgY was specific against H. pylori usease. Here, we established a simple and inexpensive method to obtain a yield of 90% purity of the anti-H. pylori IgY in combinations of the WSF method, ammonia sulfate precipitation, and affinity chromatography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".