Synthesis and characterization of fluorinated phosphonium ionic liquids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A wide variety of phosphonium ionic liquids containing fluorous ponytails Rfn (Rfn = –(CF2)n–1CF3; n = 4, 6, 10) are synthesized by the reaction of Rfn-(CH2)2-I with trialkylphosphines (R3P; R = Me, nBu, nOct). The efficacy of multiple metathetical routes to anion exchange have been investigated, thus the corresponding BF4–, PF6–, tosylate (OTs–) and triflate (OTf–) derivatives have also been prepared. All compounds have been comprehensively characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, ESI-MS, DSC, and TGA/SDTA, and in the case of [Me3PCH2CH2Rf4][I] by single crystal X-ray diffraction. These materials range from high melting solids (e.g., [Me3P(CH2)2Rf4][I] Tm = 195 °C) to very low melting liquids (e.g., [nOct3P(CH2)2Rf4][OTf] Tg = –64 °C), and they all have high thermal decomposition points (295 to 394 °C). Incorporation of the more weakly coordinating BF4– and PF6– yielded a significant increase in the melting point of the materials, in contrast to OTf– and OTs– derivatives, which all exhibited significantly depressed melting points.Key words: phosphonium ionic liquids, alternative solvents, fluorine, phosphorus, fluorous ponytails.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".