La gestion de la RSE dans un contexte international : vers une « glocalisation » des pratiques ? Une étude de cas d’entreprises françaises implantées au Mexique1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Faire face à sa Responsabilité Sociétale constitue désormais une nécessité pour l’entreprise, en particulier lorsqu’il s’agit d’une firme multinationale. De façon paradoxale, l’internationalisation des activités complique la donne dans la mesure où l’entreprise doit alors faire face à des spécificités culturelles locales. Ces spécificités entraînent des attentes différentes vis-à-vis de l’entreprise dont certaines sont susceptibles de contredire les principes sociétaux adoptés par la maison-mère (eux-mêmes conformes aux normes de comportement internationales). Comment l’entreprise adapte-t-elle sa démarche de RSE au pays d’implantation, quelles sont les parties prenantes impliquées dans ce processus ? C’est à cette question que tente de répondre l’auteur en prenant pour base l’exemple de 8 entreprises françaises ayant des filiales implantées au Mexique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".