MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066461808 · doi:10.7202/039546ar

La gestion de la RSE dans un contexte international : vers une « glocalisation » des pratiques ? Une étude de cas d’entreprises françaises implantées au Mexique1

2010· article· fr· W2066461808 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement international · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Faire face à sa Responsabilité Sociétale constitue désormais une nécessité pour l’entreprise, en particulier lorsqu’il s’agit d’une firme multinationale. De façon paradoxale, l’internationalisation des activités complique la donne dans la mesure où l’entreprise doit alors faire face à des spécificités culturelles locales. Ces spécificités entraînent des attentes différentes vis-à-vis de l’entreprise dont certaines sont susceptibles de contredire les principes sociétaux adoptés par la maison-mère (eux-mêmes conformes aux normes de comportement internationales). Comment l’entreprise adapte-t-elle sa démarche de RSE au pays d’implantation, quelles sont les parties prenantes impliquées dans ce processus ? C’est à cette question que tente de répondre l’auteur en prenant pour base l’exemple de 8 entreprises françaises ayant des filiales implantées au Mexique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it