MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066471519 · doi:10.3166/ria.21.9-33

Apprentissage actif dans les processus décisionnels de Markov partiellement observables L'algorithme MEDUSA

2007· article· fr· W2066471519 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Robin Jaulmes, Joëlle Pineau, Doina Precup

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicReinforcement Learning in Robotics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study a problem inspired from robotics in which we want to find an optimal policy to learn a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) when the agent only has an imperfect model of its environment. To help the agent in its task we assume the availability of an external operator (an oracle), that can provide information about the underlying state. We present the algorithm MEDUSA, which improves an initial POMDP model using experimentation through the environment and a minimum number of queries. We also show how MEDUSA handles non-stationary environments and how it can withstand noise in the query answer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicReinforcement Learning in RoboticsFrench-language works237,207