MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066486819 · doi:10.1177/1354067x08096513

Cultural Norms Informing Other-Conscious Selfhood in Chinese Relational Worlds

2009· article· en· W2066486819 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mao-jin Wang, Jing-jing Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueCulture & Psychology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCultural Differences and Values
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCancerCare Manitoba Foundation
KeywordsShameLoyaltyPsychologyFilial pietySocial psychologyMaximInterpersonal communicationInterpersonal relationshipEpistemologySociologyPhilosophyGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research adopts methodological relationalism as its conceptual framework. The Collection of Sages' Maxims (CSM) is used as the basic data to derive the cultural norms. Based on these norms, eight parameters (prs) are derived with 24 metaperception components of filial piety and fraternal submission(FPFS)-based interpersonal loyalty. These FPFS loyalty (FPFSL) metaperception components as third-eye party are seen to be highly sensitive and vigilant with regard to transgressions of the cultural maxim-based norms. Then these metaperception components are supposed to help prompt the transgressor to generate emotions of guilt and shame in his/her reflection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCulture & PsychologySame topicCultural Differences and ValuesFrench-language works237,207