MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066534508 · doi:10.4161/epi.5.4.11520

Reconciling the positive and negative roles of histone H2A.Z in gene transcription

2010· review· en· W2066534508 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEpigenetics · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsBiologyNucleosomeHistoneChromatinGeneticsHistone H2AHistone codeGeneDNAComputational biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The incorporation of variant histone H2A.Z within chromatin is important for proper gene expression and genome stability. H2A.Z is inserted at discrete loci by the Swr1 or Swr1-like remodeling complexes, although very little is known about the nature of the targeting mechanism involved. Replacement of canonical histone H2A for H2A.Z has been shown to modify nucleosome dynamics, although discrepancies still exist in the literature regarding the mechanisms. Recent experiments have shown that H2A.Z can allow nucleosomes to adopt stable translational positions as compared to H2A, which could influence the accessibility to DNA regulatory proteins. This review provides a brief overview of H2A.Z biology and presents hypotheses that could reconcile contradictory reports that are found in the literature regarding the influence of H2A.Z on nucleosome stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it