MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066584369 · doi:10.1039/c2fd20023f

Reaction dynamics at a metal surface; halogenation of Cu(110)

2012· article· en· W2066584369 on OpenAlexafffund
Alon Eisenstein, Lisa Leung, Tingbin Lim, Zhanyu Ning, J. C. Polanyi

Bibliographic record

VenueFaraday Discussions · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryHalogenExcited stateReaction dynamicsHalogenationReactivity (psychology)MoleculeMetalPotential energy surfaceReagentChemisorptionAtom (system on chip)Computational chemistryChemical physicsAtomic physicsPhotochemistryPhysical chemistryAdsorptionOrganic chemistryAlkyl

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy (STM) is opening up a new field of reaction dynamics, followed one-molecule-at-a-time, only recently applied to reaction at a metal surface. Here we combine experiment with theory in studying the motions involved in the successive breaking by electron-induced reaction of the two carbon-halogen bonds, C-Cl or C-I, in physisorbed p-dihalobenzene, to form chemisorbed halogen-atoms and organic residue on Cu(110) at 4.6 K. We characterize the geometry of the physisorbed initial state, p-dichlorobenzene (pDCB) and p-diiodobenzene (pDIB), at the copper surface, as well as the successive final states of both chemisorbed reaction products: electron #1 giving rise to the first halogen-atom and a chemisorbed halophenyl and electron #2 giving a second halogen-atom and a chemisorbed phenylene. The major findings reported are (a) the distance and angular distributions of the chemisorbed reaction products relative to the physisorbed reagent molecule, (b) an approximate ab initio calculation, coupled with classical molecular dynamics (MD), of the repulsion between the products on the excited potential-energy surfaces, pes*, following excitation by electrons #1 or #2, and subsequently MD on the ground-state pes with inclusion of inelastic surface-interaction as a means to understanding the above, (c) observation of the changing dynamics with the chemistry of the halogen-atom, and (d) characterization of the effects of secondary encounters among the reaction products in the constrained space of the more highly localized reaction of pDIB. Item (d) shows clear evidence of high reactivity in surface-aligned collisions with restricted impact parameter, termed Surface Aligned Reaction, SAR, characterized by STM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFaraday DiscussionsSame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207