MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066599741 · doi:10.1109/radar.2013.6586006

Simulating SCN and MSSR modes of RADARSAT-2 for ship and iceberg discrimination

2013· article· en· W2066599741 on OpenAlexaff
Janaka Deepakumara, Pradeep Bobby, Peter McGuire, Desmond Power

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsCentre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcebergDiscriminatorComputer scienceRemote sensingMode (computer interface)Synthetic aperture radarMeteorologyGeologySea iceGeographyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A tool developed for simulating RADARSAT-2 (RS2) Maritime Satellite Surveillance Radar (MSSR) mode data from higher resolution data is described. RS2 Fine and Fine Quad images containing validated ship and iceberg targets were resampled to low resolution ScanSAR Narrow (SCN) and MSSR mode data. This tool can be adopted to use other image modes as inputs and simulate other outputs as well and the simulated products are used to develop a ship and iceberg discriminator for those modes. A series of tests were applied to verify the accuracy of the backscatter characteristics of the simulated products and the performance of the target discriminator are presented for SCN and MSSR mode Ocean Surveillance, Very wide swath, Near incidence (OSVN)[1]. Since there was a very limited ship data suitable for simulating MSSR mode available, only a demonstration of MSSR OSVN classifier was included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207