Ascorbate decreases Fabry cerebral hyperperfusion suggesting a reactive oxygen species abnormality: An arterial spin tagging study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that reactive oxygen species contribute to the cerebral hyperperfusion in Fabry disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We examined the effect of intravenous injection of ascorbate on cerebral blood flow (CBF) using magnetic resonance arterial spin tagging. Nineteen patients with Fabry disease and 15 control subjects were studied as part of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). RESULTS: Vertebro-basilar hyperperfusion was observed in patients with Fabry disease. A decrease in systemic ascorbate levels relative to healthy controls was found in the patients. CBF decreased after ascorbate infusion in both control subjects and patients treated with ERT. The placebo group had a significantly delayed decrease in the CBF response after ascorbate infusion. Myeloperoxidase levels were elevated in Fabry patients, consistent with ongoing inflammatory processes in these patients. CONCLUSION: Increased CBF in Fabry disease may be related to increased production of reactive oxygen species, while low plasma ascorbate levels suggests a global redox imbalance. These abnormalities were improved by ERT. These observations have implications regarding oxidative processes contributing to accelerated atherosclerosis in Fabry disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".