MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066612780 · doi:10.1145/1236246.1236306

Voronoi-Delaunay duality and Delaunay meshes

2007· article· en· W2066612780 on OpenAlexaff
Ramsay Dyer, Hao Zhang, Torsten Möller

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoronoi diagramDelaunay triangulationPolygon meshBowyer–Watson algorithmConstrained Delaunay triangulationComputer scienceCentroidal Voronoi tessellationMathematicsGeometryAlgorithmComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we are concerned with Delaunay triangulations of the vertex set of a piecewise flat (pwf) surface. We first propose the notion of well-formed Voronoi diagrams and establish a precise dual relationship between them and proper Delaunay triangulations on pwf surfaces. Then we provide an algorithm which, given any input manifold triangle mesh, constructs a Delaunay mesh: a manifold triangle mesh whose edges form an intrinsic Delaunay triangulation of its vertex set. Rather than relying on a geodesic Delaunay triangulation on the input mesh, our algorithm swaps the physical mesh edges based on the locally Delaunay criterion. We prove that when a physical edge that is not locally Delaunay is swapped, the surface area of the mesh is reduced. In order to ensure a proper Delaunay triangulation, some new vertices may need to be introduced, leading to a refinement scheme, and we detail the cases involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207