O Contrato de Factoring Internacional nos Ordenamentos Jurídicos Brasileiro e Portugûes e a Uniformização das Regras Aplicáveis a Esta Modalidade Contratual
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Com o desenvolvimento das relações comerciais envolvendo partes situadas em países distintos, em decorrência dos efeitos da globalização e da intensificação da interdependência econômica entre os estados, as negociações do contrato de factoring incrementaram-se no âmbito internacional, na década de sessenta, e, a partir de então, adquiriram especial relevância para o Direito Comercial Internacional. Todavia, o contrato de factoring ainda padece de atipicidade legislativa em quase todos os ordenamentos jurídicos – inclusive no Brasil e em Portugal. Diante disso, a Convenção do Unidroit de 1988 sobre o factoring internacional, realizada em Ottawa, bem como a Convenção de Roma de 1980 sobre a lei aplicável às obrigações contratuais merecem destaque pelo papel desepenhado na tentativa de uniformização das regras aplicáveis a esta modalidade contratual no âmbito do comércio internacional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".