O Contrato de Factoring Internacional nos Ordenamentos Jurídicos Brasileiro e Portugûes e a Uniformização das Regras Aplicáveis a Esta Modalidade Contratual
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Com o desenvolvimento das relações comerciais envolvendo partes situadas em países distintos, em decorrência dos efeitos da globalização e da intensificação da interdependência econômica entre os estados, as negociações do contrato de factoring incrementaram-se no âmbito internacional, na década de sessenta, e, a partir de então, adquiriram especial relevância para o Direito Comercial Internacional. Todavia, o contrato de factoring ainda padece de atipicidade legislativa em quase todos os ordenamentos jurídicos – inclusive no Brasil e em Portugal. Diante disso, a Convenção do Unidroit de 1988 sobre o factoring internacional, realizada em Ottawa, bem como a Convenção de Roma de 1980 sobre a lei aplicável às obrigações contratuais merecem destaque pelo papel desepenhado na tentativa de uniformização das regras aplicáveis a esta modalidade contratual no âmbito do comércio internacional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".