MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066639113 · doi:10.1128/jb.01537-08

Analysis by Mutagenesis of a Chromosomal Integron Integrase from <i>Shewanella amazonensis</i> SB2BT

2009· article· en· W2066639113 on OpenAlexafffund
André Larouche, Paul H. Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bacteriology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsIntegronIntegrasesIntegraseBiologyGeneticsGene cassettePlasmidGeneRecBCDMutagenesisMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrons are mobile genetic elements that can integrate and disseminate genes as cassettes by a site-specific recombination mechanism. Integrons contain an integrase gene (intI) that carries out recombination by interacting with two different target sites; the attI site in cis with the integrase and the palindromic attC site of a cassette. The plasmid-specified IntI1 excises a greater variety of cassettes (principally antibiotic resistance genes), and has greater activity, than chromosomal integrases. The aim of this study was to analyze the capacity of the chromosomal integron integrase SamIntIA of the environmental bacterium Shewanella amazonensis SB2BT to excise various cassettes and to compare the properties of the wild type with those of mutants that substitute consensus residues of active integron integrases. We show that the SamIntIA integrase is very weakly active in the excision of various cassettes but that the V206R, V206K, and V206H substitutions increase its efficiency for the excision of cassettes. Our results also suggest that the cysteine residue in the beta-5 strand is essential to the activity of Shewanella-type integrases, while the cysteine in the beta-4 strand is less important for the excision activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BacteriologySame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207