Partage d'information et performance de coentreprises implantées par les PME québécoises dans les pays en développement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deux hypothèses de recherche ont été examinées dans cette étude. La première établit une relation entre le partage d’information entre les partenaires d’une coentreprise, le mode de contrôle managérial utilisé, les coûts de transaction, les effets de synergie et la performance. La seconde hypothèse suggère que les PME diffèrent des grandes entreprises quant à la forme de contrôle managérial qu’elles privilégient dans les coentreprises. À l’aide d’une étude de cas effectuée auprès de sept coentreprises établies en Afrique, nous avons pu constater que la première hypothèse était partiellement confirmée alors que la deuxième l’était entièrement. Ces résultats qualitatifs devraient cependant être corroborés par d’autres études qui réuniraient un plus grand nombre de coentreprises et intégreraient certaines variables environnementales et structurelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".