MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066663136 · doi:10.1002/oca.800

A practical approach to control of nonlinear discrete‐time state‐delay systems

2007· article· en· W2066663136 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptimal Control Applications and Methods · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBounding overwatchControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemLinear matrix inequalityComputer scienceDiscrete time and continuous timeConstant (computer programming)Class (philosophy)Full state feedbackController (irrigation)MathematicsControl (management)Mathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The robust feedback stabilization of a class of nonlinear discrete‐time systems with unknown constant state‐delay and uncertain function of nonlinear perturbations is considered based on linear matrix inequality (LMI)‐based analysis and design procedures. In both cases of nominal and resilient feedback designs, the trade‐off between the size of the controller gains and the bounding factors is illuminated and incorporated into the design formalism. A dynamic output feedback controller is then designed for this class of systems. Seeking computational convenience, all the developed results are cast in the format of LMIs and several numerical examples are presented throughout the paper to demonstrate the advantages of the design methods. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it