MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Standards of practice in the field of hearing implants

2013· article· en· W2066682420 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Van de Heyning, Oliver F. Adunka, Santiago L. Arauz, Marcus D. Atlas, Stefan Brill, Iain Bruce, Craig A. Buchman, Marco Caversaccio, Margaret T. Dillon, Robert H. Eikelboom, Gunnar Eskilsson, Javiér Gavilán, B. Godey, K. Green, R Hagen, Demin Han, Shōichi Iwasaki, Mohan Kameswaran, Eva Karltorp, Andrea Kleine Punte, Martin Kompis, Jafri Kuthubutheen, V. E. Kuzovkov, Luis Lassaletta, Yan Li, Artur Lorens, M. Manikoth, Jane Martin, Robert Mlynski, J. Mueller, Martin O’Driscoll, Lorne Parnes, Harold C. Pillsbury, Sandra Prentiss, Sasidharan Pulibalathingal, C. H. Raine, Gunesh P. Rajan, Ranjith Rajeswaran, Herbert Riechelmann, Adriana Rivas, Juan Gómez Rivas, Pascal Senn, Piotr H. Skarżyński, Georg Sprinzl, Hinrich Staecker, K. Stephan, S. B. Sugarova, S-I Usami, Astrid Wolf‐Magele, Yu. К. Yanov, Máximo Zernotti, Kim Zimmerman, Patrick Zorowka, Henryk Skarżyńśki

Bibliographic record

VenueCochlear Implants International · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHearing Impairment and Communication
Canadian institutionsVictoria HospitalLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAudiologyField (mathematics)MedicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2005 the World Health Organization estimated that approximately 278 million people suffered from ‘moderate to profound hearing impairment,’ 80% of whom lived in low- and middle-income countries ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.188
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.296
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1880.296
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.011
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0070.010
Research integrity0.0100.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCochlear Implants InternationalSame topicHearing Impairment and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207