Formation of heterocyclic arylboronates by thermally induced 1,4-aryl migration in diarylboron chelates of <i>C</i>-(1-hydroxyalkyl)nitrones. Crystal and molecular structures of some of the rearrangement products and of one of the educts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synthesis of heterocyclic arylboronates has been carried out by thermally induced rearrangement of diarylboron chelates of C-(1-hydroxyalkyl)nitrones. The structures have been determined from spectroscopic data and from X-ray analyses. Thermoanalytical and time-dependent NMR measurements give information on the nature of the isomerization reaction. Crystal data (at 293 K for 2j, 180 K for the others): 1m, monoclinic, P21/n, a = 14.059(3), b = 12.5531(13), c = 14.8531(6) Å, β = 95.8067(12)°, Z = 4; 2j, triclinic, [Formula: see text]1, a = 10.4729(11), b = 13.5896(11), c = 9.5803(7) Å, α = 104.764(6), β = 103.279(7), γ = 107.278(7)°, Z = 2; 2m, monoclinic, P21/n, a = 14.9442(13), b = 11.990(2), c = 16.0613(4) Å, β = 114.0153(7)°, Z = 4; 9, monoclinic, P21/n, a = 11.123(2), b = 18.433(3), c = 13.4852(4) Å, β = 108.2075(7)°, Z = 4. The structures were solved by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares procedures to R(F, I [Formula: see text] 3σ(I)) = 0.036, 0.052, 0.043, and 0.040, respectively, for AFC6 data for 2j and CCD data for 1m, 2m, and 9. All four molecules contain six-membered OBONCC rings, with an approximately planar ON=CC segment in the educt 1m and approximately planar OBOC segments in the rearrangement products. A probable transition state geometry is derived for the isomerization process.Key words: diarylboron chelates, C-(1-hydroxyalkyl)nitrones, heterocyclic arylboronates, organoboron compounds, rearrangement, crystal structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".