MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066733320 · doi:10.1071/rdv24n1ab134

134 TRANSCRIPTOME PROFILE OF BOVINE BLASTOCYSTS DERIVED FROM ALTERNATIVE IN VIVO AND IN VITRO CULTURE CONDITIONS AT SPECIFIC PHASES OF EARLY EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT

2011· article· en· W2066733320 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Gad, U. Besenfelder, V. Havlíček, Michael Hölker, F. Rings, Isabelle Dufort, Marc‐André Sirard, K. Schellander, Dawit Tesfaye

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlastocystAndrologyIn vivoTranscriptomeBiologyEmbryogenesisIn vitroEmbryoIn vitro fertilisationInner cell massEmbryonic stem cellMicroarrayHuman fertilizationEmbryo transferEmbryo cultureMicroarray analysis techniquesCell biologyGene expressionGeneticsGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An understanding of gene expression patterns due to altered environmental conditions during different time points of the pre-implantation period would improve our knowledge on regulation of embryonic development and improve success of embryo culture. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of alternative in vivo and in vitro culture conditions at specific phases of early embryonic development on transcriptome profile of bovine blastocysts. Using nonsurgical endoscopic oviducal transfer technology, 5 different blastocyst groups were produced. The first 2 groups were matured in vitro and then either transferred after maturation or after in vitro fertilization to synchronized recipients. The other 3 groups were matured, fertilized and cultured in vitro until 4-cell, 16-cell and morula stage before transfer. Blastocysts from each group were collected by uterine flushing at Day 7 and pooled in groups of 10. Complete in vitro (IVP) and in vivo blastocysts were produced and used as controls. A unique custom microarray (Agilent) containing 42 242 oligo probes (60-mers) was used over 6 replicates of each group vs the in vivo control group to examine the transcriptome profile of blastocysts. Compared with the in vivo control group, clear dramatic shifts were found in the number of differentially expressed genes (DEG, fold change =2) at 2 different time points. The first shift occurred for blastocyst groups that were transferred after in vitro fertilization and before embryonic genome activation (EGA). The second shift occurred for blastocyst groups that were transferred after EGA, as well as for the IVP group. Ontological classification of DEG showed that the more time spent under in vitro conditions, the higher the percentage of DEG involved in cell death and apoptotic processes. Moreover, lipid metabolism was the most significant process affected in the blastocysts transferred after in vitro maturation and blastocysts transferred at 16-cell stage. Most DEG involved in this process were down-regulated. Pathway analysis revealed that signalling pathways were the dominant pathways in all groups except the group that was transferred after in vitro maturation. That group showed significant down-regulation for genes involved in retinoic acid receptors activation pathways. These results showed that fertilization and EGA were the most critical developmental stages influenced by in vitro culture conditions and subsequently affect blastocyst quality, as measured in terms of gene expression patterns. Moreover, we identified molecular mechanisms and pathways that were influenced by altered culture conditions. These findings will enable the examination of strategies for modifying in vitro culture conditions at critical stages that will allow more efficient production of developmentally competent blastocysts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207