MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066736411 · doi:10.1117/12.707994

Optical single sideband modulation based on superstructure grating for a remotely controlled phased array antenna system

2006· article· en· W2066736411 on OpenAlexaff
Sébastien Blais, Jianping Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhased arraySidebandFiber Bragg gratingCompatible sideband transmissionOpticsTrue time delayAntenna (radio)BeamformingModulation (music)Beam steeringSuperstructurePhase modulationPhased-array opticsPhysicsElectronic engineeringBeam (structure)Computer scienceRadio frequencyEngineeringOptical fiberTelecommunicationsAcousticsPhase noise

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A single sideband (SSB) modulation scheme using a superstructure fiber Bragg grating (FBG) for a remotely controlled photonic true time-delay (TTD) beamforming system is presented in this paper. Photonic true time-delay (TTD) is considered a promising technique for wideband phased array antennas, as it allows beam steering of the antenna without the beam squint problem. For remotely controlled phased array antennas, the dispersive properties of a single mode fiber induce a power penalty at discrete RF frequencies when a double sideband (DSB) modulation scheme is used. The SSB modulation scheme is an effective way to eliminate this power penalty as only one sideband is transmitted and thus no beating is possible upon the recovery of the electrical signal by a photodetector. This paper presents for the first time a theoretical model as well as experimental results of a SSB modulation scheme based on a superstructure grating with two phase shifts. The true-time delay system considered utilizes a discrete uniform Bragg prism which allows discrete beam steering capabilities for the phased array antenna.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207