Aspectos Transnacionais da Luta Contra a Violência Doméstica e Familiar no Brasil / Transnational Aspects of the Fight Against Domestic and Intra-Family violence in Brazil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo:O artigo articula duas histórias conhecidas: o Caso Maria da Penha Maia Fernandes na Comissão Interamericana de Direitos Humanos e o processo político culminando com a promulgação da Lei Maria da Penha. Pretende-se revelar dinâmicas transnacionais que podem aumentar as chances de o Estado absorver de forma ampla as reivindicações de grupos sociais vulneráveis. Essas duas histórias ilustram estratégias transnacionais do movimento feminista através das quais um tema, como violência doméstica, deixa de ser considerado privado, de interesse apenas de um pequeno grupo diretamente afetado, e passa a ser tema de interesse público, gerando uma agenda política que é incorporada pelo Estado. Tais estratégias pressupõem um processo de tomada de consciência dos atores relevantes, sejam eles estatais ou não estatais, e de aumento da pressão política sobre os atores estatais não democráticos que impedem as transformações de políticas públicas.Palavras-chave: Violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher; Caso Maria da Penha. Lei nº11.340/06; Redes feministas transnacionais. Abstract:The article brings together two stories - the Case Maria da Penha Maia Fernandes before the Inter-American Human Rights Commission and the political process culminating with the enactment of the Maria da Penha Law - to reveal transnational dynamics that may increase the chances of having the State incorporate the claims of socially vulnerable groups. These two stories illustrate how transnational strategies used by feminist movements may enhance processes through which a topic, such as domestic violence, is no longer considered to be private, and becomes the subject of public interest, generating a political agenda that is incorporated by the State. Such strategies foster processes of awareness raising of the relevant state and non-state actors, and increased political pressure on undemocratic state actors that impede the transformation of public policies.Keywords: Domestic and intra-family violence against women; Case Maria da Penha, Law 11340/06; Transnational feminst networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".