MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066796374 · doi:10.1182/blood-2008-06-165233

The Montreal platelet syndrome kindred has type 2B von Willebrand disease with the VWF V1316M mutation

2008· article· en· W2066796374 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shannon Jackson, Gary Sinclair, Stéphanie Cloutier, Zhaoxia Duan, Margaret L. Rand, Man‐Chiu Poon

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoUniversité LavalHôpital de l'Enfant-JésusCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVon Willebrand diseaseVon Willebrand factorPlateletRistocetinCoagulopathyInternal medicineMutationBleeding timeEndocrinologyImmunologyMedicineChemistryPlatelet aggregationBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Montreal platelet syndrome (MPS), hitherto described in only one kindred, is a hereditary thrombocytopenia associated with mucocutaneous bleeding, giant platelets, and spontaneous platelet aggregation in vitro. These are features shared with some forms of type 2B von Willebrand disease (VWD); however, the MPS kindred had not been investigated for VWD. We found that all affected MPS family members had borderline to normal von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag; 0.43-0.75 U/mL), discrepantly low ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo; 0.16-0.29 U/mL), and normal factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C; 0.57-1.04 U/mL). Unaffected family members all had normal VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and FVIII:C levels. In addition, persons with MPS, but not unaffected family members, had loss of plasma (but not platelet) high molecular weight VWF multimers, and were heterozygous for the previously reported V1316M type 2B VWD mutation. Thus, in reevaluating this kindred, we determined that patients with MPS have type 2B VWD with the V1316M VWF mutation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207