Oviposition behaviour and response of <i>Monochamus scutellatus</i> (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to conspecific eggs and larvae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The oviposition behaviour of white‐spotted sawyer beetle Monochamus scutellatus (Say) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) females was studied under laboratory and field conditions. Females walked over the bark surface and stopped to palpate it with their labial and maxillary palpi. Once a potential oviposition site was located, the female excavated a scar in the bark with her mandibles, deposited an egg and brown plug in the scar and inserted her mandibles again into the scar prior to leaving the area. Female M. scutellatus preferred to lay eggs on bolts containing no eggs (control) to those containing eggs from other females, but did not show this preference when provided with control bolts and those containing their own eggs. When females were provided with bolts containing their own eggs and bolts containing eggs from other females, they laid more eggs on bolts containing their own eggs. Females laid more eggs on control bolts than on bolts containing their own larvae or larvae from other females. The brown plug in the oviposition scar may provide a protective barrier to the egg, a chemical message that the site is occupied, or both.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".