MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066822959 · doi:10.1364/ol.29.001730

Generation of pure two-beam interference grating structures in an optical fiber with a femtosecond infrared source and a phase mask

2004· article· en· W2066822959 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsMaterials scienceFemtosecondFiber Bragg gratingCore (optical fiber)Optical fiberGratingLong-period fiber gratingPulse durationLens (geology)FiberPhase (matter)Beam (structure)Diffraction gratingOptoelectronicsPlastic optical fiberFiber optic sensorLaserPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fiber Bragg gratings were fabricated in all-silica core fiber by focusing 125-fs 800-nm pulses with an 80-mm lens through a phase mask with 4.28-microm pitch onto a fiber sample. When the phase-mask-fiber separation was 5 mm the observed structure was clearly the result of two-beam interference between the +/- 1 orders. The elimination of the remaining 9 orders is a consequence of the walk-off experienced by the mask orders and the short duration of the femtosecond pulse. This effect is unique to the fabrication of Bragg gratings with femtosecond sources and would not be observed with a longer pulse duration or incoherent UV sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it