MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066823833 · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00999-2

The mouse sino‐atrial node expresses both the type 2 and type 3 Ca<sup>2+</sup> release channels/ryanodine receptors

2003· article· en· W2066823833 on OpenAlexaff
Haruko Masumiya, Hideyuki Yamamoto, Myriam Hemberger, Hikaru Tanaka, Koki Shigenobu, S.R.Wayne Chen, Tetsushi Furukawa

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRyanodine receptorRyanodine receptor 2ChemistryReceptorGene isoformIntracellularRYR1Messenger RNACell biologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyMolecular biologyBiochemistryMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ca(2+) released from intracellular Ca(2+) stores is shown to be involved in pacemaker activity in the sino-atrial (SA)-node. However, little is known about the molecular identity of the Ca(2+) release channel/ryanodine receptor (RYR) involved in pacemaker activity. We examined the mRNA distribution of three different RYR isoforms (RYR1, RYR2, and RYR3) in the mouse SA-node. RNase protection assay and in situ hybridization revealed that RYR2 mRNA expresses widely in the heart including the SA-node, while RYR3 mRNA expression is limited to the SA-node and to the right atrium. Thus, not only RYR2 but also RYR3 may participate in pacemaker activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207