MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066892310 · doi:10.2118/112756-ms

Solid Expandable Tubular System Mitigates High-Pressure Zones with Record Length

2008· article· en· W2066892310 on OpenAlexaff
W. H. Bagley, Don Schultz, Joe Mueller, Marcus Vondenstein, Harsh Chowdhary

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasingCompletion (oil and gas wells)DrillingPetroleum engineeringDrill pipeDrillWellboreDrilling fluidDeepwater drillingGeologyEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dealing with higher than planned pore pressures, slim drilling margins and depleted zones in the same wellbore can quickly compound an already difficult deepwater drilling environment. Current market demands for oil and gas are placing more focus on deepwater development of existing reserves. Operators have had to utilize enabling technologies that are robust enough to address multiple problems to develop deepwater reserves that are difficult to access. This paper describes a recent example of this dilemma when a deepwater operator successfully employed a solid expandable tubular system to isolate both overpressured and depleted sands The solid expandable system facilitated reaching the well objectives with a large hole size for maximize production rates. Over 6,865 ft (2,092m) of 7-5/8 × 9-5/8 in. expandable openhole liner allowed the operator to drill through both overpressured and depleted sands to an intermediate and unplanned casing point. Subsequent drilling operations below the expandable liner enabled the operator to reach the target zone and case the well with a 7 in. flush-joint production liner. Without the expandable installation, the operator would have been restricted to a maximum 5-1/2 in. casing at total depth (TD). Comparatively, 7 in. casing allowed the use of larger completion equipment providing Nexen Petroleum U.S.A., Inc., with significant additional production while reducing the mechanical risks associated with working inside smaller casing. The solid expandable tubular operating envelope provides a robust technology for operators who need a responsive system that addresses conditions proven to hinder drilling objectives. This paper will describe the conditions that led to selecting the solid expandable solution and detail the challenges mitigated with the installation of this record-setting system. In addition, this paper will focus on how solid expandable tubulars are applicable in extremely difficult drilling conditions and also how these tubulars can reduce the risks and costs associated with deepwater drilling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207