Beam Design Force Demands in Steel Plate Shear Walls with Simple Boundary Frame Connections
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Where simple beam-to-column connections are used in the boundary frame of a steel plate shear wall and the tension fields in the infill plates are assumed to be uniform and at the yield stress for capacity design, the moment and shear force distributions in each beam are statically determinate, while the axial force distribution is highly indeterminate and depends on several contributing factors. In this paper, in addition to quantifying appropriate moment and shear force distributions for use in design, a simple but powerful analysis method is presented for evaluating the beam’s axial force demand. The method is based on the principle of capacity design and nonlinear finite element simulations of wall systems with different numbers of stories, infill plate aspect ratios and thicknesses, and lateral load distributions. The axial force demands are highly dependent on the mechanism of load transfer to the system from the floor and roof diaphragms and the shear force distribution in the compression column. The various components of shear force demand on the beams of the system are also studied, and it is shown that the net shear forces on an intermediate beam depend on the pattern of yield progression in the infill plates above and below. A method for determining appropriate design moment and shear values is proposed for the case where the same infill plate thickness is used above and below an intermediate beam. The methods presented for moment, shear, and axial force determination are verified against experimental results for a two-story steel plate shear wall with simple bolted double-angle beam-to-column connections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it