MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066952520 · doi:10.3198/jpr2008.02.0095crc

Registration of ‘CDC Lophy‐I’ Barley

2008· article· en· W2066952520 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plant Registrations · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytase and its Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHordeum vulgareUstilagoFusariumAgronomyStrawGrain yieldCultivarSmutCropHorticulturePoaceaeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

‘CDC Lophy‐I’ (Reg. No. CV‐339, PI 653112; CN 111360; CFIA Reg. No. 6335; Canadian PBR Appl. No. 06–5470) is a two‐rowed spring hulless feed barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) developed at the Crop Development Centre (CDC), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. CDC Lophy‐I was tested as SR03044 in CDC yield trials from 2003 to 2004 before being evaluated from 2004 to 2005 in the Western Canadian Hulless Barley Cooperative Tests as HB379. CDC Lophy‐I is the first commercial barley variety containing the lpa3‐1 gene, which results in a 60 to 65% reduction in seed phytate compared with conventional barley varieties. This is the lowest seed phytate content of any currently registered barley variety worldwide. Additionally, CDC Lophy‐I combines good kernel weight and strong straw with low Fusarium head blight (incited by Fusarium graminearum Schwabe) deoxynivalenol accumulation and resistance to loose smut [incited by Ustilago nuda (Jens.) Rostr.].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it