MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066981355 · doi:10.1159/000195842

Reexamination of the Elastic Properties of Emphysematous Lungs

2009· article· de· W2066981355 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiration · 2009
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational and environmental lung diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityRoyal Victoria Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We calculated specific lung elastance (E<sub>S, L</sub>) as the change of lung elastic recoil pressure (P<sub>el L</sub>) required to produce a given fractional change in lung volume (ΔV<sub>L</sub>/V<sub>L, 0</sub>) as a function of transpulmonary pressure (P<sub>L</sub>) from published data in normal lungs, and in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or α<sub>1</sub>-antitrypsin deficiency (α<sub>1</sub>-AD). E<sub>sL</sub>, in normal lungs, is the bulk modulus, and was systematically greater than P<sub>L</sub>. dE<sub>s, L</sub>/dP<sub>L</sub> increased with V<sub>L</sub>. P<sub>L</sub> at E<sub>S, L</sub> = 30 cm H<sub>2</sub>O decreased with age in normal lungs, but E<sub>s, L</sub> at P<sub>L</sub> = 8 cm H<sub>2</sub>O showed no age relationship. In both COPD and α<sub>1</sub>-AD E<sub>S, L</sub> and dE<sub>s, L</sub>/dP<sub>L</sub> were increased compared to normal lungs. We conclude that E<sub>S, L</sub> is a curvilinear function of P<sub>L•</sub>in normal lungs, COPD and α<sub>1</sub>AD, and is systematically greater than P<sub>L•</sub> The increase in E<sub>S, L</sub> and dE<sub>s, L</sub>/dP<sub>L</sub> in COPD and α<sub>1</sub>-AD compared to normals probably represents two distinct abnormalities in the elastic properties of emphysematous lungs: (1) an increase in resting length of alveolar walls accounting for hyperinflation, and (2) a decrease in extensibility of alveolar walls once they become stressed. Using total lung capacity (TLC) as an index of the former and E<sub>S, L</sub> as an index of the latter, we showed no correlation between either and FEV<sub>1•</sub> Thus abnormalities in lung elastic properties in emphysema do not account for chronic expiratory flow limitation in emphysema. Furthermore, the increased values of E<sub>s, L</sub> in emphysema suggest that emphysematous airspaces are poorly ventilated. As they are presumably poorly perfused, emphysema per se may not disturb ventilation perfusion ratios seriously

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it