MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Crohnʼs Disease and the Footprints of Flagellin: Etiopathogenic Clue or Epiphenomenon?

2005· article· en· W2066992883 on OpenAlexafffund
Kevin P. Rioux, Levinus A. Dieleman

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEpiphenomenonFlagellinMedicineDiseaseCrohn's diseaseImmunologyInternal medicinePhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elevated flagellin-specific immunoglobulins in Crohn's disease. Sitaraman SV, Klapproth J-M, Moore DA III, et al. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005;288:G403-406. Inflammatory bowel disease is believed to result from an aberrant mucosal immune response to commensal bacteria that reside in the intestinal tract. In this article, Sitaraman et al hypothesize that flagellin is a specific and dominant immunogenic target of the adaptive mucosal immune system that may be of etiologic importance in Crohn's disease (CD). To test this theory, sera from patients with inflammatory bowel disease and healthy controls were screened for immunoreactivity to lysates of E. coli and Salmonella that had been subjected to SDS-PAGE. Similarly, immunoreactivity to purified flagellin was assessed. Patients with CD were found to have circulating antibodies against a variety of proteins present in the bacterial lysates, but the dominant antigenic target was clearly a band that comigrated with purified flagellin. This was not observed in sera from healthy control patients or in those with ulcerative colitis (UC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicAutoimmune Bullous Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207