Bibliographic record
Abstract
At least seven different chloride/anion currents have now been identified in astrocytes, oligodendrocytes/Schwann cells, and microglia. Only for two of these currents is the corresponding gene known. One of these genes is not encoding for a chloride channel, but for a class of mitochondria-like pores also found in cell membranes. Astrocytes and oligodendrocytes differ in their resting properties: astrocytes accumulate chloride but do not have a significant permeability. Oligodendrocytes have a close to passive distribution and a significant permeability. Under certain circumstances, astrocytes can express a resting chloride conductance. Reactive and neoplastic astrocytes as well as astrocytes with an altered shape exhibit a resting conductance. The function of these channels certainly involves volume regulation. Other possible functions are potassium homeostasis, migration, proliferation (in microglia), and involvement in spreading depression waves. Of greatest interest are two phenomena discovered in situ: The ClC-2 channel is only found in astrocytic endfeet near blood capillaries adjacent to neuronal GABA(A) receptors. In the supraoptic nucleus of the hypothalamus, there is an osmosensitive astrocytic taurine release. This released taurine interacts with glycine receptors in neighboring neurons, causing inhibition. It is assumed that with the future availability of more in situ, rather than in vitro, studies, an increased number of such complex interactions between glial cells, neurons, and blood vessels will be discovered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".