MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067032918 · doi:10.1386/ijfs.13.2.183/1

Unilinguisme, bilinguisme et esthtique interculturelle dans les dramaturgies francophones du Canada

2010· article· en· W2067032918 on OpenAlexaffabout
Louise Ladouceur

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Francophone Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College Saint-Jean
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrenchContext (archaeology)DramaIdentity (music)Neuroscience of multilingualismSine qua nonMultilingualismSociologyMulticulturalismLinguisticsHistoryEthnologyHumanitiesAestheticsArtLiteraturePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada, Francophone communities outside Quebec constitute a small minority in a mainly anglophone environment. In these communities, French is seen as an identity language by francophones who are bilingual out of necessity. The bilingualism of the Franco-Canadian communities, previously invested with the negative connotations specific to Quebec's perception of it, takes on a different added value within the context of globalisation. Furthermore, if it is seen as a corrupting influence on French within a context where French is the vehicular language, bilingualism becomes an instrument of resistance in a predominantly English context where it constitutes a condition sine qua non for remaining francophone. The resulting heterolingualism of Franco-Canadian drama seems to be increasingly accentuated as one moves westward from Ontario. On display in certain productions such as Roger Auger's Je m'en vais Rgina , Kenneth Brown's Cow-boy potr and Marc Prescott's Sex, Lies et les Franco-Manitobains , this heterolingualism represents a linguistic specificity within Canada's French-language drama repertoires. In order to reach a larger audience, certain plays have recently been presented with English surtitles that enable an exploration of new intercultural aesthetics inspired by the realities of life for Francophones within a minority context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Francophone StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207