MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067043817 · doi:10.1021/nl0055153

Embossed Polymeric Relief Structures as a Template for the Growth of Periodic Inorganic Microstructures

2001· article· en· W2067043817 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Dick, Jeremy C. Sit, M. J. Brett, I. M. N. Votte, Cees W. M. Bastiaansen

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOptical Coatings and Gratings
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceEmbossingThermosetting polymerDeposition (geology)MicrostructureNanostructureNickelNanotechnologySiliconNanoscopic scaleComposite materialChemical engineeringOptoelectronicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method is presented for the glancing angle deposition (GLAD) of inorganic micro- and nanostructures using polymeric relief structures as seeding sites. Conventional embossing processes in thermoset resins are used to produce the relief structures, which potentially facilitates large scale production array production. By utilizing GLAD to control the film deposition conditions over these arrays, we have fabricated periodic lattices (2 μm periodicity) of both silicon dioxide pillars with a thickness of 1.58 μm and oblique nickel columns of thickness 0.60 μm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNano LettersSame topicOptical Coatings and GratingsFrench-language works237,207