MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067052533 · doi:10.1109/icip.2008.4712107

Chaos and MPEG-7 based feature vector for video object classification

2008· article· en· W2067052533 on OpenAlexaff
Hanif Azhar, Aishy Amer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Feature vectorArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)HistogramChaoticComputer visionFeature extractionAttractorSupport vector machineMotion vectorMathematicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a method to generate unique feature vectors for video objects using chaos theory and MPEG-7 visual descriptors. We consider each feature element of visual descriptors as a dynamic system. The proposed method performs feature binding of the re-constructed trajectory of simulated chaotic attractors using histogram analysis. The binding derives two feature vectors different from the original MPEG-7 one, for each video object. We use the new vectors for object classification. Low (e.g., Logistic Map) and high (e.g., Mackey-Glass) dimensional chaotic attractors are used. Dynamic feature reduction (35.44% on average) in the proposed feature vectors are achieved from the MPEG-7 feature vector. Cross validation accuracy with different classifiers shows significant (87.6% on average) improvement with the proposed feature vectors over that (73.2% on average) of the MPEG-7 feature vector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207