MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067053438 · doi:10.1145/2750858.2807540

IDyLL

2015· article· en· W2067053438 on OpenAlexafffund
Qiang Xu, Rong Zheng, Steve Hranilovic

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Council
KeywordsIdyllInertial measurement unitComputer scienceComputer visionDead reckoningSilhouetteArtificial intelligenceAmbiguityGeographyRemote sensingTelecommunicationsGlobal Positioning SystemArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Location-based services have experienced substantial growth in the last decade. However, despite extensive research efforts, sub-meter location accuracy with low-cost infrastructure continues to be elusive. In this paper, we propose IDyLL -- an indoor localization system using inertial measurement units (IMU) and photodiode sensors on smartphones. Using a novel illumination peak detection algorithm, IDyLL augments IMU-based pedestrian dead reckoning with location fixes. We devise a robust particle filter framework to mitigate identity ambiguity due to the lack of communication capability of conventional luminaries and sensing errors. Experimental study using data collected from smartphones shows that IDyLL is able to achieve high localization accuracy at low costs. Mean location errors of 0.38 m, 0.42 m, and 0.74 m are reported from multiple walks in three buildings with different luminary arrangements, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.063

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207