MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067053438 · doi:10.1145/2750858.2807540

IDyLL

2015· article· en· W2067053438 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Council
KeywordsIdyllInertial measurement unitComputer scienceComputer visionDead reckoningSilhouetteArtificial intelligenceAmbiguityGeographyRemote sensingTelecommunicationsGlobal Positioning SystemArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Location-based services have experienced substantial growth in the last decade. However, despite extensive research efforts, sub-meter location accuracy with low-cost infrastructure continues to be elusive. In this paper, we propose IDyLL -- an indoor localization system using inertial measurement units (IMU) and photodiode sensors on smartphones. Using a novel illumination peak detection algorithm, IDyLL augments IMU-based pedestrian dead reckoning with location fixes. We devise a robust particle filter framework to mitigate identity ambiguity due to the lack of communication capability of conventional luminaries and sensing errors. Experimental study using data collected from smartphones shows that IDyLL is able to achieve high localization accuracy at low costs. Mean location errors of 0.38 m, 0.42 m, and 0.74 m are reported from multiple walks in three buildings with different luminary arrangements, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it