MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067113404 · doi:10.1063/1.2968224

X-ray diffraction imaging of strain fields in a domain-inverted LiTaO3 crystal

2008· article· en· W2067113404 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithium tantalateFerroelectricityCondensed matter physicsDiffractionPolarization (electrochemistry)Materials scienceCoercivityLattice constantLattice (music)OpticsElectric fieldCrystallographyLithium niobatePhysicsChemistryOptoelectronicsDielectric

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate lattice orientation and strain fields across ferroelectric domain walls in a single crystal lithium tantalate using x-ray diffraction imaging (topography). The sample is an actual voltage-operated optical switch consisting of a series of triangular polarization-inverted domains formed in an originally poled single crystal. By applying an electric field only about 2% of the coercive field in the forward and reverse directions, we observed asymmetric lattice rotation of about 10−6 rad, and normal strain variation in the order of 10−5 with reference to the zero-field state. Our results confirm that in congruent LiTaO3 crystals there is unexpectedly large strain field expanding several micrometers across the domain walls, in contrast with the widely accepted theoretical fact that in this material the polarization reversal establishes over only a few lattice constants, resulting in small and localized lattice distortions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it