MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067117726 · doi:10.1191/0309133302pp352ra

Recent research on the nature, origin and climatic relations of blocky and stratified slope deposits

2002· article· en· W2067117726 on OpenAlexaff
Henk van Steijn, Jan Boelhouwers, Stuart A. Harris, Bernard Hétu

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à RimouskiUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySubaerialDebrisSedimentary rockAeolian processesGeomorphologyClastic rockGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A selection of subaerial slope processes is discussed together with the morphological and sedimentological traces that are left by the processes. Emphasis is on mass transfers related to (coarse) blocky slopes and to scree accumulations, either on steep or on gentle slopes. New developments in the interpretation of more or less clearly stratified slope deposits are discussed in the light of the findings of research focusing on present-day process-form (process-material) relationships. The question of the climatic (and, more specifically, the periglacial) significance of the different processes and their morpho-sedimentary expression is a returning theme in this paper. It is concluded that many deposits are formed by azonal processes, although their activity (in terms of magnitude-frequency combinations) is often relatively high under periglacial conditions. Some of the deposits point to (cold-climate) extreme events. This especially is the case for frost-coated clast flows, aeolian transport of large platy clasts, and to a lesser extent debris flows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Physical Geography Earth and EnvironmentSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207